BARRAZA v. HOF & YATES REBAR, INC.
CASE NO.: BC539967
HEARING: 03/09/17

#1
TENTATIVE ORDER

I. Defendant/Cross-Defendant/Cross-Complainant IMAC CONSTRUCTION INC.’s motion for summary adjudication as to Defendant/Cross-Defendant HOF & YATES REBAR, INC. is GRANTED. (CCP § 437(c)(a).)
II. Defendant/Cross-Defendant/Cross-Complainant IMAC CONSTRUCTION INC.’s motion for summary adjudication as to Cross-Defendant/Cross-Complainant J GINGER MASONRY, LP is GRANTED. (CCP § 437(c)(a).)

The Court has ruled on the evidentiary objections, and placed the signed orders in the Court file. The Court notes that Objections to the separate statement are somewhat misplaced, as the statement itself is not evidence, nor is the counsel’s characterization of the underlying evidence cited therein.

Moving Parties to give Notice.

Plaintiff JOSE BARRAZA was injured at a construction site on October 23, 2013. At the time of Plaintiff’s injury, he was an employee of Cross-Defendant/Cross-Complainant J GINGE