SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – CENTRAL DISTRICT
DEPARTMENT 53
JOSEPH S., et al.; Plaintiffs, vs. BEAUTIFUL MINDS CENTER FOR AUTISM, INC., et al.; Defendants.
Case No.: BC523355
Hearing Date: October 31, 2016
Time: 8:30 a.m.
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE:
DEFENDANT BEAUTIFUL MINDS CENTER FOR AUTISM, INC.S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS
Defendant BEAUTIFUL MINDS CENTER FOR AUTISM, INC.’S motion for summary judgment is CONTINUED to December 22, 2016.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Jack S., Joseph S., and Daniel S., by and through their guardian ad litem (collectively “Plaintiffs”), filed this action on October 3, 2013. Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint on December 13, 2013. On October 6, 2016, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a Second Amended Complaint.
Jack S. and Joseph S. are twin brothers that suffer from autism. Daniel S. is their younger brother. Plaintiffs allege that Defendant Marco Sandoval, who was employed by B
Hearing Date
October 31, 2016
Type
Other PI/PD/WD (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – CENTRAL DISTRICT
DEPARTMENT 53
JOSEPH S., et al.; Plaintiffs, vs. BEAUTIFUL MINDS CENTER FOR AUTISM, INC., et al.; Defendants.
Case No.: BC523355
Hearing Date: October 31, 2016
Time: 8:30 a.m.
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE:
DEFENDANT BEAUTIFUL MINDS CENTER FOR AUTISM, INC.S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS
Defendant BEAUTIFUL MINDS CENTER FOR AUTISM, INC.’S motion for summary judgment is CONTINUED to December 22, 2016.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Jack S., Joseph S., and Daniel S., by and through their guardian ad litem (collectively “Plaintiffs”), filed this action on October 3, 2013. Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint on December 13, 2013. On October 6, 2016, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a Second Amended Complaint.
Jack S. and Joseph S. are twin brothers that suffer from autism. Daniel S. is their younger brother. Plaintiffs allege that Defendant Marco Sandoval, who was employed by B