Defendant System Inc’s Motion for Determination of Good Faith Settlement (CCP Section 887.6) – HEARING REQUIRED.
The proof of service does not comply with the provisions of Code Civ. Proc. §1010.6(e), which requires one serving a represented party by electronic means to demonstrate confirmation of the correct electronic address for counsel being served. In the absence of any response by opposing counsel herein, the Court cannot conclude that service was properly accomplished. Therefore, counsel shall appear to confirm compliance with the requirements for electronic service.
CV-18-003771 – SEDERQUIST, JEREMY VS. CITY OF TURLOCK – a) Defendant City of Turlock’s Motion for Summary Judgment – DENIED; b) Cross-Defendant George Reed Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment – DENIED.
a) The City, as the moving party, has failed to meet its burden of demonstrating entitlement to summary judgment. Specifically, the Court finds that Defendant has failed to establish at least one issue foundational to