The court has reviewed the Notices of Related Case and briefing presented by counsel. The court finds the cases are not related under CRC Rule 3.300.

The only party that appears in both cases is the City of San Diego. While both cases involve Proposition B approved by the voters in 2012, there are additional parties in each and the claims are different and do not arise from the same or similar transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact.

The Verified Complaint in Quo Warranto filed September 27, 2019 is an action pursuant to CCP § 803 challenging the City's placement of Proposition B on the ballot [pension reform approved by the voters and added to the Charter effective July 20, 2012] without bargaining as required under the Meyer' Milias-Brown Act [MMBA] [Gov. Code §§ 3500 et.seq.], thus rendering the charter amendment invalid. The complaint by California Taxpayers Action Network [CTAN] filed August 2