Defendants Vince Sampo and Sampo Engineering, Inc. (collectively, "Defendants")'s motion to strike portions of the second amended complaint is granted in part and denied in part. On August 6, 2020, Plaintiff Lawrence S. Frankel ("Plaintiff") voluntarily dismissed his request for attorney's fees as to all causes of action with prejudice (ROA Nos. 30 and 31). Accordingly, Defendants' motion to strike as to page 21, paragraph 38, line 4, is denied as moot. Defendants' motion to strike as to: (1) page 9, paragraph 64, lines 3-5; and (2) page 18, paragraph 10, lines 14-15, is granted. The court deems Plaintiff's lack of opposition to be a concession as to the motion's merits. In addition, the court finds that Plaintiff has not alleged facts showing that Defendants' conduct amounts to oppression, fraud, or malice. See Turman v. Turning Point of Central Cal., Inc. (2010) 191 Cal. App. 4th 53, 63; Cal. Civ. Code § 3294(a), (c). By failing to oppose the motion, Plaintiff does not meet his burde