Search anything: case name, case number, motion type, judge, or party
(Subscribe to View)
Track Rulings In Case
August 27, 2019
San Diego County, CA
Civil - Unlimited
Writ of Mandate
Elijah Acosta (Petitioner), represented by Wendy R Dumlao
California Department of Social Services (Respondent), represented by DARIN L WESSEL
Department of Social Services (Respondent)
Will Lightbourne in his official capacity as the Director of Department of Social Services (Respondent), represented by DARIN L WESSEL
Contreras Aranda Vs Specia
Ag La Mesa Llc Vs Stancil
Orueta Vs Gregory
Wells Fargo Bank Na Vs Morgan
Kim Vs Sk Cuisine Corporation
Jones Vs. Bzdawka
Soto Vs Diaz
Tentative Ruling on Petition for Writ of Mandate Acosta v. Lightbourne, Case No. 2018-38408 August 30, 2019, 1:30 p.m., Dept. 72 1. Overview and Procedural Posture. In this case, the petitioner seeks a writ of mandate pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5 ordering respondent, the Director of the Dept. of Social Services, to set aside his July 25, 2017 written decision in State Hearing No. 201730035, confirming an earlier decision by San Bernardino County to deny "protective supervision services" (i.e., 24-hour-a-day supervision) under the In-Home Supportive Services ("IHSS") program to petitioner, effective January 6, 2017. In his July 25, 2017 decision, respondent determined that petitioner was eligible for 105 hours and 56 minutes of monthly IHSS benefits but was not entitled to "protective supervision services," effective January 6, 2017. Administrative Record ("AR"), p. 3. This action was filed........
You can see and manage all of your alerts under Settings -> Alerts
Add to your subscription and access more dockets and more documents!
Your subscription was successfully upgraded
Please wait a moment while we load this page.