Investment Services V Devkom International LLC vs. Pacificwave Partners Limited

TENTATIVE RULING: The CONTINUED Motion of Defendants PACIFIC WAVE PARTNERS LIMITED and COCONNECT, INC. to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint is GRANTED as to COCONNECT, INC., but DENIED as to PACIFIC WAVE PARTNERS LIMITED.

Plaintiff has the initial burden of demonstrating facts justifying the exercise of jurisdiction. As to CoConnect, Plaintiff has not provided any additional evidence to find California, or this court, has jurisdiction over CoConnect.

Defendant PACIFIC WAVE PARTNERS LIMITED ("Pacificwave") does not dispute that having an office in California would grant the court jurisdiction. Thus, the contention boils down to whether Plaintiff has provided evidence establishing Pacificwave has a presence in California.

Plaintiff seeks judicial notice of exhibits that are printouts from a website that Plaintiff represents is Pacificwave's website. The printouts show they are from a "PacificWave Partners" website. Whether "PacificWave........