The Court rules on Defendant D.R. Horton Los Angeles Holding Company, Inc.'s evidentiary objections to Plaintiff's evidence as follows:

Objections 6 and 7 are sustained. The remaining objections to Plaintiff's evidence are overruled. The Court declines to rule on Plaintiff's evidentiary objections asserted in Plaintiff's Opposing Separate Statement. While the separate statement may refer to specific evidentiary objections by objection number, the objection may not be restated or reargued in the separate statement. See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1354(b).

The Court sustains Plaintiff's objections to D.R. Horton's Response to Plaintiff's Opposing Separate Statement as it is not authorized under Code of Civil Procedure § 437c. See Nazir v. United Airlines, Inc. (2009) 178 Cal.App.4th 243, 252. The Court further sustains Plaintiff's objections to the Supplemental Declaration of Ray Martin, the Supplemental Declaration of Keith Alex, the Supplemental Declar........