SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
DATE/TIME October 21, 2020, 1:30 p.m. DEPT. NO 23 JUDGE HON. LAURIE M. EARL CLERK E. BERNARDO
THE TWO HUNDRED, et al., Case No.: 34-2020-80003447
Petitioners,
v.
GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF PLANNING AND
RESEARCH, et al.,
Respondents.
Nature of Proceedings: MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Following is the Court’s tentative ruling denying Petitioners’ motion for a preliminary injunction.
BACKGROUND
Petitioners are an unincorporated association of people who advocate on behalf of low income minorities affected by California’s housing crisis and increasing wealth gap. (See 1st Amend. Pet., ¶ 106.) By this action, they challenge the validity of several new regulations developed and adopted by Respondents Office of
Hearing Date
October 21, 2020
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
DATE/TIME October 21, 2020, 1:30 p.m. DEPT. NO 23 JUDGE HON. LAURIE M. EARL CLERK E. BERNARDO
THE TWO HUNDRED, et al., Case No.: 34-2020-80003447
Petitioners,
v.
GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF PLANNING AND
RESEARCH, et al.,
Respondents.
Nature of Proceedings: MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Following is the Court’s tentative ruling denying Petitioners’ motion for a preliminary injunction.
BACKGROUND
Petitioners are an unincorporated association of people who advocate on behalf of low income minorities affected by California’s housing crisis and increasing wealth gap. (See 1st Amend. Pet., ¶ 106.) By this action, they challenge the validity of several new regulations developed and adopted by Respondents Office of