SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
DATE/TIME AUGUST 6, 2020, 10:00 a.m. DEPT. NO 23 JUDGE HON. LAURIE M. EARL CLERK E. BERNARDO
DAVIS WHITE, Case No.: 34-2020-80003438
Petitioner,
v.
ALEX PADILLA, in his official capacity as Secretary
of State of California,
Respondent.
XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as
Attorney General of California, et al.
Real Parties in Interest.
Nature of Proceedings: PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE
Following is the Court’s tentative ruling denying the petition for writ of mandate.
BACKGROUND
This is a challenge to the ballot title and summary and ballot prepared by the Attorney General for Proposition 22, an initiative measure that will appear on the November 3, 2020
Hearing Date
August 06, 2020
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
DATE/TIME AUGUST 6, 2020, 10:00 a.m. DEPT. NO 23 JUDGE HON. LAURIE M. EARL CLERK E. BERNARDO
DAVIS WHITE, Case No.: 34-2020-80003438
Petitioner,
v.
ALEX PADILLA, in his official capacity as Secretary
of State of California,
Respondent.
XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as
Attorney General of California, et al.
Real Parties in Interest.
Nature of Proceedings: PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE
Following is the Court’s tentative ruling denying the petition for writ of mandate.
BACKGROUND
This is a challenge to the ballot title and summary and ballot prepared by the Attorney General for Proposition 22, an initiative measure that will appear on the November 3, 2020