SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
DATE/TIME October 4, 2019, 10:00 a.m. DEPT. NO 25 JUDGE HON. LAURIE M. EARL CLERK D. BEAROR
LUCIA MAR UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Case No.: 34-2018-00228770
Plaintiff,
v.
DESIGNATED LOCAL AUTHORITY, AS
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
PISMO BEACH, et al.,
Defendants.
Nature of Proceedings: PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE
Following is the court’s tentative ruling denying the petition for writ of mandate.
FACTUAL, PROCEDURAL, AND LEGAL BACKGROUND
This case is another in a long line of cases arising out of what is frequently referred to as the “great dissolution” of California’s nearly 400 redevelopment agencies. This case, however, is quite unique. The legal, factual,
Hearing Date
October 04, 2019
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
DATE/TIME October 4, 2019, 10:00 a.m. DEPT. NO 25 JUDGE HON. LAURIE M. EARL CLERK D. BEAROR
LUCIA MAR UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Case No.: 34-2018-00228770
Plaintiff,
v.
DESIGNATED LOCAL AUTHORITY, AS
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
PISMO BEACH, et al.,
Defendants.
Nature of Proceedings: PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE
Following is the court’s tentative ruling denying the petition for writ of mandate.
FACTUAL, PROCEDURAL, AND LEGAL BACKGROUND
This case is another in a long line of cases arising out of what is frequently referred to as the “great dissolution” of California’s nearly 400 redevelopment agencies. This case, however, is quite unique. The legal, factual,