Proposed intervener Rajiv Gujral's motion to intervene in this action under CCP 387 is GRANTED for the reasons set forth below. The pleading in intervention shall be filed upon presentment to the clerk and payment of the requisite filing fee.
In this action, plaintiff seek to recover a brokerage commission he alleges is due as a result of defendants' purchase of the Pala Mesa Golf Resort in Fallbrook California.
"A third party may intervene (1) where the proposed intervener has a direct interest, (2) intervention will not enlarge the issues in the litigation, and (3) the reasons for the intervention outweigh any opposition by the present parties." (US Ecology, Inc. v. State of Caledonia (2001) 92 CaI.App.4th 113).
Proposed intervener argues that he entered into an agreement with plaintiff under which he was to receive 1/2 half the commission upon sale. Proposed intervener claims that he has a direct interest in the litigation as his right to recovery is dependent upon plaintiff's su
Hearing Date
March 26, 2014
Category
Civil - Unlimited
Type
Breach of Contract/Warranty
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Proposed intervener Rajiv Gujral's motion to intervene in this action under CCP 387 is GRANTED for the reasons set forth below. The pleading in intervention shall be filed upon presentment to the clerk and payment of the requisite filing fee.
In this action, plaintiff seek to recover a brokerage commission he alleges is due as a result of defendants' purchase of the Pala Mesa Golf Resort in Fallbrook California.
"A third party may intervene (1) where the proposed intervener has a direct interest, (2) intervention will not enlarge the issues in the litigation, and (3) the reasons for the intervention outweigh any opposition by the present parties." (US Ecology, Inc. v. State of Caledonia (2001) 92 CaI.App.4th 113).
Proposed intervener argues that he entered into an agreement with plaintiff under which he was to receive 1/2 half the commission upon sale. Proposed intervener claims that he has a direct interest in the litigation as his right to recovery is dependent upon plaintiff's su