April 11, 2013
44
Civil - Unlimited
Breach of Contract/Warranty
Air Design (Cross - Defendant)
Track This PartyAMCO Insurance Company on behalf of CLF Enterprises Inc. (Cross - Defendant), represented by Jennifer L Snodgrass Willis
Track This PartyAMCO Insurance Company on behalf of CLF Enterprises Inc. (Cross - Defendant), represented by Laura Buttrell
Track This PartyArellano Drywall (Cross - Defendant), represented by Bryan T Bjorge
Track This PartyCedar Valley Concrete Corp… (Cross - Defendant)
Track This PartyCentral Valley Painting in… (Cross - Defendant)
Track This PartyDoes 1-100 (Defendant)
Track This PartyEnergetic Lath & Plast… (Cross - Defendant)
Track This PartyFramecon Incorporated (Cross - Defendant)
Track This PartyGeneral Construction Works… (Cross - Defendant)
Track This PartyGenesis Tile Corp (Cross - Defendant)
Track This PartyHolmes-Hally Industries dba The Garage Door Center (Cross - Defendant), represented by William A Jenkins
Track This PartyJMA Investments LTD (Cross - Defendant), represented by Suzanne A Tollefson
Track This PartyJMA Investments LTD (Cross - Defendant), represented by David E Beeby
Track This PartyJohnston, Roberta K. (Plaintiff), represented by David A Frenznick
Track This PartyKleary Masonry Inc. (Cross - Defendant)
Track This PartyLexington Insurance, Intervenor for Cross-Defendant Energetic Lath & Plaster, Inc., (Intervenor), represented by Steven M Hepps
Track This PartyMarticus Electric Inc (Cross - Defendant)
Track This PartyMcCrorey, Aeryn (Plaintiff), represented by David A Frenznick
Track This PartyMcCrorey, Helene Rachel (Plaintiff), represented by David A Frenznick
Track This PartyMCML Enterprises (Cross - Defendant), represented by William D Morrow
Track This PartyNajarian, Jube J. (Special Master), represented by Jube J Najarian
Track This PartyNajarian, Jube J. (Special Master)
Track This PartyNorman Scheel Structural Engineering (Cross - Defendant), represented by Lindy H Scoffield
Track This PartyNorthstar Plumbing (Cross - Defendant)
Track This PartyOrdonez, Stanley M. (Plaintiff), represented by David A Frenznick
Track This PartyOrdonez, Trina S. (Plaintiff), represented by David A Frenznick
Track This PartyProBuilders Specialty Insurance Company, RRG (Intervenor), represented by John R Campo
Track This PartyRCR Companies Inc (Cross - Defendant)
Track This PartyRepublic Electric West Inc (Cross - Defendant)
Track This PartyRoes 1 through 200 (Cross - Defendant)
Track This PartySacramento A-1 Door (Cross - Defendant)
Track This PartyTim Lewis Communities LLC (Defendant), represented by Jason A Rose
Track This PartyTim Lewis Communities LLC (Defendant), represented by Jerome R Satran
Track This PartyTim Lewis Communities LLC (Defendant), represented by Peter W Dye
Track This PartyTimberlake Cabinetry a Division of American Woodmark Corporation (Cross - Defendant), represented by Julie McElroy
Track This PartyTraverls Indemnity Company of Connecticut on behalf of Cross-Defendant CLF Enterprises, Inc dba The Door and Windown Company, a suspended corporation (Intervenor), represented by Suzanne A Tollefson
Track This PartyVaca Valley Roofing Inc. (Cross - Defendant), represented by Edwin S Nakagawa
Track This PartyVictor & Adhemar Arellano, A Partnership (Cross - Defendant), represented by Bryan T Bjorge
Track This PartyVillara Corporation (Cross - Defendant)
Track This Party2017-03-29T00:00:00
2016-05-11T00:00:00
2016-04-27T00:00:00
2014-10-27T00:00:00
2014-07-09T00:00:00
Kevin Stripling vs. Ivan Escobarmoz
Donald Gibson vs. 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc.
Tina Sikes vs. Henning Inc
Angellica Tapia Estrada vs. james Clyde Tidwell
Kaylene Dill vs. Michael Scott Campbell
Michael Urquidez vs. County of Sacramento
M.A. Bernard vs. The California Housing Finance Authority
Michael Moad vs. City of Citrus Heights
Rosemarie Gonsalves vs. Laura Machado
Athena Aviles vs. CS Norcal Inc
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.
Plaintiffs motion to consolidate the instant action with six other construction defects actions for purposes of complex case coordination, discovery, pre-trial motions and trial is DENIED for the reasons set forth below.
Plaintiffs seek to consolidate seven separate construction defects actions. Each action is brought by a separate set of plaintiffs. Each action involves a separate residential neighborhood with a different set of developer and builder defendants. Plaintiffs contend that the separate actions raise many of the the same legal issues and facts and would involve many of the same expert witnesses.
Multiple defendants and cross-complainants ("Defendants") oppose consolidation arguing that the cases have very little in common. Defendants point out that the cases involve different plaintiffs and defendants and diffferent construction projects. Defendants argue that there would be different witnesses in every case and different factual and legal issues. Defendants further argu