1-3. Motions to Compel Further Responses to Form Interrogatories. 4-6. Motions to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories 7-9. Motions to Compel Further Responses to Requests for Production of Documents 10-12. Motions to Compel Further Responses to Requests for Admissions
Moving Party: Defendant William Scallorn Responding Party: Plaintiffs John Nord, Sheran Marron, and Simon R. Nord, III
Ruling for Motions 1-3: Defendant’s motion to compel further responses to form interrogatories is granted as to Form Interrogatory Nos. 6.3 and 17.1 and denied as to Form Interrogatory Nos. 10.1, 10.2, and 10.3.
Plaintiffs’ responses to Form Interrogatory No. 6.3 is evasive. Plaintiffs John Nord, Sheran Marron, and Simon R. Nord, III are ordered to serve a further, complete, verified response within 10 days of service of Notice of Ruling.
Plaintiffs’ responses to Form Interrogatory Nos. 10.1, 10.2, and 10.3 are full and complete. Plaintiffs’ responses to Form Interrogatory No. 17.1 is inco
Hearing Date
April 12, 2021
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
1-3. Motions to Compel Further Responses to Form Interrogatories. 4-6. Motions to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories 7-9. Motions to Compel Further Responses to Requests for Production of Documents 10-12. Motions to Compel Further Responses to Requests for Admissions
Moving Party: Defendant William Scallorn Responding Party: Plaintiffs John Nord, Sheran Marron, and Simon R. Nord, III
Ruling for Motions 1-3: Defendant’s motion to compel further responses to form interrogatories is granted as to Form Interrogatory Nos. 6.3 and 17.1 and denied as to Form Interrogatory Nos. 10.1, 10.2, and 10.3.
Plaintiffs’ responses to Form Interrogatory No. 6.3 is evasive. Plaintiffs John Nord, Sheran Marron, and Simon R. Nord, III are ordered to serve a further, complete, verified response within 10 days of service of Notice of Ruling.
Plaintiffs’ responses to Form Interrogatory Nos. 10.1, 10.2, and 10.3 are full and complete. Plaintiffs’ responses to Form Interrogatory No. 17.1 is inco