Search anything: judges, parties, opposing counsel, motion types, legal issues
(Subscribe to View)
Track Rulings In Case
August 17, 2020
Orange County, CA
Nov 09, 2020
Oct 26, 2020
Oct 05, 2020
Sep 21, 2020
Sep 14, 2020
Aug 31, 2020
Decker Vs. Johnson
Oliver-Horist Vs. Wescom Central Credit Union
Battikhi Vs. Mesa Resturant
Safavi Vs. Kristen Ritzau, D.D.S
Kantar Vs. Sheriff-Coroner Don Barnes
Cittell Vs. South Coast Plaza
Tml Recovery, Llc Vs. The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company
Brown Vs. Anaheim Global Medical Center
Larson Vs. Freedline
Motion to Strike Portions of the Complaint Moving Party: Defendant Bernard Turbow (esa Bernard Turbo) Responding Party: None Ruling: Defendant Bernard Turbow, M.D.’s Motion to Strike Portions of the Plaintiff Vinh Huu Nguyen’s Complaint is GRANTED with leave to amend. (Code Civ. Proc., § 436.) The Complaint fails to plead facts supporting the claim for punitive damages or attorney’s fees. To plead a claim to recover punitive damages, a plaintiff must allege facts showing malice, oppression, or fraud. (Civ. Code, § 3294(a).) A complaint must allege specific factual allegations to support a request for punitive damages. (See, e.g., Anschutz Entertainment Group, Inc. v. Snepp (2009) 171 Cal.App.4th 598, 643.) The Complaint here does not allege specific facts showing any malice, oppression or fraud. Attorney’s fees are recoverable only if provided for by contract or statute. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1033.5; see also §§ 1021, 1032(a)(5).) The Complaint in........
Your alert tracking was succesfully added. We will email you
when new changes related to are available.
You can see and mange all your Tracking alerts under Alert Settings
Add to your subscription and access more dockets and more documents!
Your subscription was successfully upgraded
Please wait a moment while we load this page.