(1)
Defendant Amin Mirhadi’s Demurrer to the Complaint is OVERRULED in its entirety. (See Code Civ. Proc. § 430.10(e).) Defendant Amin Mirhadi is ordered to file and serve an answer within ten days.
Code of Civil Procedure § 430.60 provides that unless the grounds for a demurrer are distinctly specified, it may be disregarded.
Where there are several grounds for demurrer, each must be stated in a separate paragraph; and must state whether the challenge is to the entire pleading or to some specific cause of action therein. (See Cal. R. Ct. Rule 3.1320(a).) As Plaintiffs correctly point out, Defendant’s Demurrer is procedurally defective since he only demurred to the First Cause of Action. ROA 27.
However, because Defendant did advise Plaintiff that he would demurrer to each cause of action (Supp. Jain Decl., Ex. A.) and included these arguments in his supporting memorandum, the Court exercises its discretion to consider the merits of Defendants’ arguments.
The complaint alleges adequate
Hearing Date
January 09, 2020
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
(1)
Defendant Amin Mirhadi’s Demurrer to the Complaint is OVERRULED in its entirety. (See Code Civ. Proc. § 430.10(e).) Defendant Amin Mirhadi is ordered to file and serve an answer within ten days.
Code of Civil Procedure § 430.60 provides that unless the grounds for a demurrer are distinctly specified, it may be disregarded.
Where there are several grounds for demurrer, each must be stated in a separate paragraph; and must state whether the challenge is to the entire pleading or to some specific cause of action therein. (See Cal. R. Ct. Rule 3.1320(a).) As Plaintiffs correctly point out, Defendant’s Demurrer is procedurally defective since he only demurred to the First Cause of Action. ROA 27.
However, because Defendant did advise Plaintiff that he would demurrer to each cause of action (Supp. Jain Decl., Ex. A.) and included these arguments in his supporting memorandum, the Court exercises its discretion to consider the merits of Defendants’ arguments.
The complaint alleges adequate