DEF Donald K. Reitzfeld 1. Demurrer to Complaint
DEF Val-Chris Investments, Inc. 2. Demurrer to Complaint
3. Case Management Conference
Defendant Donald Reitzfeld’s demurrer to the complaint of plaintiff Robert Campoy is sustained with 15 days leave to amend.
Defendant Val-Chris Investments, Inc.’s demurrer to Plaintiff’s complaint is sustained with 15 days leave to amend.
Val-Chris’ request for judicial notice is granted as to item 3; it is otherwise denied.
First Cause of Action for Violation of California Rosenthal Fair Debt Collections Practices Act
Plaintiff has not alleged that his debt to Defendant is a consumer debt or that they regularly engage in collecting on consumer debts. Davidson v. Seterus, Inc. (2018) 21 Cal. App. 5th 283, 295–96 review denied (June 13, 2018).
Nor has Plaintiff presented any argument to defend this cause of action. See Herzberg v. County of Plumas (2005) 133 Cal. App. 4th 1, 20 (“Plaintiffs did not oppose the County's demurrer to this portion of their
Hearing Date
November 07, 2019
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
DEF Donald K. Reitzfeld 1. Demurrer to Complaint
DEF Val-Chris Investments, Inc. 2. Demurrer to Complaint
3. Case Management Conference
Defendant Donald Reitzfeld’s demurrer to the complaint of plaintiff Robert Campoy is sustained with 15 days leave to amend.
Defendant Val-Chris Investments, Inc.’s demurrer to Plaintiff’s complaint is sustained with 15 days leave to amend.
Val-Chris’ request for judicial notice is granted as to item 3; it is otherwise denied.
First Cause of Action for Violation of California Rosenthal Fair Debt Collections Practices Act
Plaintiff has not alleged that his debt to Defendant is a consumer debt or that they regularly engage in collecting on consumer debts. Davidson v. Seterus, Inc. (2018) 21 Cal. App. 5th 283, 295–96 review denied (June 13, 2018).
Nor has Plaintiff presented any argument to defend this cause of action. See Herzberg v. County of Plumas (2005) 133 Cal. App. 4th 1, 20 (“Plaintiffs did not oppose the County's demurrer to this portion of their