Motion of John M. Pierce of Pierce Bainbridge Beck Price & Hecht LLP to Be Relieved as Counsel for Defendant Daniel E. Catullo III:
Attorney John M. Pierce and the law firm of Pierce Bainbridge Beck Price & Hecht, LLP (collectively “Counsel”) bring a motion to withdraw as counsel of record for defendants. The motion is GRANTED as to defendant Daniel E. Catullo, III and DENIED without prejudice as to defendants The City Drive Group, LLC (“CDG”), and The City Drive Films, LLC (“CDF”).
A motion to be relieved as counsel of record must be served on the client via personal service, electronic service, or mail. Cal. Rule of Court 3.1362(d).
If served via mail, the accompanying declaration must state the service address is current. Cal. Rule of Court (CRC) 3.1362(d)(1)(A).
A motion to be relieved as counsel must also be accompanied by a declaration that states in general terms and without compromising the confidentiality of attorney-client relationship the basis for the motion and why consent
Hearing Date
November 07, 2019
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Motion of John M. Pierce of Pierce Bainbridge Beck Price & Hecht LLP to Be Relieved as Counsel for Defendant Daniel E. Catullo III:
Attorney John M. Pierce and the law firm of Pierce Bainbridge Beck Price & Hecht, LLP (collectively “Counsel”) bring a motion to withdraw as counsel of record for defendants. The motion is GRANTED as to defendant Daniel E. Catullo, III and DENIED without prejudice as to defendants The City Drive Group, LLC (“CDG”), and The City Drive Films, LLC (“CDF”).
A motion to be relieved as counsel of record must be served on the client via personal service, electronic service, or mail. Cal. Rule of Court 3.1362(d).
If served via mail, the accompanying declaration must state the service address is current. Cal. Rule of Court (CRC) 3.1362(d)(1)(A).
A motion to be relieved as counsel must also be accompanied by a declaration that states in general terms and without compromising the confidentiality of attorney-client relationship the basis for the motion and why consent