Search anything: case name, case number, motion type, judge, or party
Deborah C SERVINO
(Subscribe to View)
July 31, 2020
Orange County, CA
Aug 21, 2020
Jul 10, 2020
Jan 24, 2020
Nov 22, 2019
Romero V. Lgc North America, Inc., Et Al.
Wood V. Neyer, Et Al.
Gross V. Westpark Corte Bella Community Association, Et Al.
Jacobs V. Marion, Et Al.
Jacobson V. Craig Esterley And Dianna Esterley As Trustee Of The Esterley Family Trust, Et Al.
Roush, Et Al. V. Fca Us, Llc
Aab Park Real Estate Holdings, Llc V. Singh, Et Al.
Fuentes Martinez V. Heliker, Et Al.
Sqi Diagnostics Systems, Inc. V. Predictive Health Diagnostics, Inc.
Renneker V. Snyder Langston Holdings, Llc
Plaintiff Sepehr Mojab’s motion for order compelling Defendant City of Tustin’s person most knowledgeable to appear at deposition, is denied. Code of Civil Procedure, section 2025.450, subdivision (a) provides that when a party deponent is served with a deposition notice and, without having served a valid objection under Code of Civil Procedure section 2025.410, fails to appear for deposition the party giving notice may move for an order compelling the deponent’s attendance and testimony at deposition. The motion must be accompanied by a meet and confer declaration under Code of Civil Procedure section 2016.040, or when the deponent fails to attend the deposition and produce the documents in the deposition notice, by a declaration stating that the moving party contacted the deponent to inquire about the nonappearance. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2025.450, subd. (b)(2).) Such meet and confer declaration must show a reasonable and good faith attempt to informally resolve the issue. ........
You can see and manage all of your alerts under Settings -> Alerts
Please wait a moment while we gather your results.