Search anything: case name, case number, motion type, judge, or party
Deborah C SERVINO
(Subscribe to View)
August 7, 2020
Orange County, CA
Romero V. Lgc North America, Inc., Et Al.
Gross V. Westpark Corte Bella Community Association, Et Al.
Wood V. Neyer, Et Al.
Jacobs V. Marion, Et Al.
Jacobson V. Craig Esterley And Dianna Esterley As Trustee Of The Esterley Family Trust, Et Al.
Roush, Et Al. V. Fca Us, Llc
Aab Park Real Estate Holdings, Llc V. Singh, Et Al.
Fuentes Martinez V. Heliker, Et Al.
Sqi Diagnostics Systems, Inc. V. Predictive Health Diagnostics, Inc.
Renneker V. Snyder Langston Holdings, Llc
The court grants Plaintiff Lorenzo C. Gonzalez’s unopposed motions to compel discovery responses as to Defendants Todd Marinovich and Trudi Marinovich to: (1) request for production, set one; (2) form interrogatories, set one; and (3) special interrogatories, set one. The court also grants Plaintiff’s motions to deem request for admissions, set one, admitted as to Defendants. A propounding party may move for an order compelling responses to interrogatories at any time “[i]f a party to whom interrogatories are directed fails to serve a timely response.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.290, subd. (b).) By failing to serve timely responses, the party to whom the interrogatories were directed waived “any right to exercise the option to produce writings under Section 2030.230, as well as any objection to the interrogatories, including one based on privilege or on the protection for work product.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.290, subd. (a).) A propounding party may move for an orde........
You can see and manage all of your alerts under Settings -> Alerts
Please wait a moment while we gather your results.