Motion 1: To Compel Further Responses to Request for Production. Motion 2: To Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories. Moving Party Plaintiff Jane VV Doe. Responding Party Defendant OC Burger Boys LLC/ Carl’s Jr.
Ruling Motion 1: Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Request for Production is GRANTED.
Defendant served boilerplate objections to all discovery without proving any substantive responses. After three months of delay, Defendant provided partial supplemental responses. Plaintiff is still entitled to seek full responses for requests that were not fully provided.
“[E]ven if the responding party serves untimely interrogatory responses after the propounding party has served the motion,” the court may grant a motion to compel responses. Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants (2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 407. Within fifteen (15) days, Defendant shall provide further responses to Nos. 2, 3, 10, 11 & 14. These responses shall inclu