Petition for Writ - DENIED
Petitioner Sean Robert’s petition for a writ of administrative mandate is DENIED.
On 4/9/08, Petitioner’s California Financing Law (“CFL”) license was revoked and he agreed to be barred from any position of employment, management or control of any finance lender/broker (“Order Barring” or “Order”); Petition was permitted, however, to petition for reinstatement of his CFL license on a later date.
Petitioner requested reinstatement in 2013 and was denied. He filed another petition for reinstatement on 4/6/17. The Commissioner of the California Department of Business Oversight (Respondent) denied the Petition on 10/8/18, finding that the Supplemental Declaration Petitioner submitted in support of his petition had false or misleading statements of facts, and that Petitioner’s employment history since the Order Barring failed to demonstrate his claimed rehabilitation and compliance with the Order.
Petitioner now asserts that the Commissioner’s 10/8/18 Order was a
Hearing Date
October 07, 2019
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Petition for Writ - DENIED
Petitioner Sean Robert’s petition for a writ of administrative mandate is DENIED.
On 4/9/08, Petitioner’s California Financing Law (“CFL”) license was revoked and he agreed to be barred from any position of employment, management or control of any finance lender/broker (“Order Barring” or “Order”); Petition was permitted, however, to petition for reinstatement of his CFL license on a later date.
Petitioner requested reinstatement in 2013 and was denied. He filed another petition for reinstatement on 4/6/17. The Commissioner of the California Department of Business Oversight (Respondent) denied the Petition on 10/8/18, finding that the Supplemental Declaration Petitioner submitted in support of his petition had false or misleading statements of facts, and that Petitioner’s employment history since the Order Barring failed to demonstrate his claimed rehabilitation and compliance with the Order.
Petitioner now asserts that the Commissioner’s 10/8/18 Order was a