Search anything: case name, case number, motion type, judge, or party
Deborah C SERVINO
(Subscribe to View)
Track Rulings In Case
July 26, 2019
Orange County, CA
Gross V. Westpark Corte Bella Community Association, Et Al.
Romero V. Lgc North America, Inc., Et Al.
Wood V. Neyer, Et Al.
Jacobs V. Marion, Et Al.
Jacobson V. Craig Esterley And Dianna Esterley As Trustee Of The Esterley Family Trust, Et Al.
Renneker V. Snyder Langston Holdings, Llc
Aab Park Real Estate Holdings, Llc V. Singh, Et Al.
Roush, Et Al. V. Fca Us, Llc
Sqi Diagnostics Systems, Inc. V. Predictive Health Diagnostics, Inc.
Fuentes Martinez V. Heliker, Et Al.
Plaintiffs Julie Nassif’s and Toby Nassif’s motion for leave to file a second amended complaint is denied.
Plaintiffs’ request for judicial notice of the First Amended Complaint filed in the instant action is denied as unnecessary. “[A]ll that is necessary is to call the court’s attention to such papers.” (Weil & Brown, Cal. Practice Guide: Civil Procedure Before Trial (The Rutter Group 2017) ¶ 9.53.1a.)
Motions for leave to amend pleadings are directed to the sound discretion of the court. “The court may, in furtherance of justice, and on any terms as may be proper, allow a party to amend any pleading.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 473, subd. (a)(1); see also Code Civ. Proc., § 576.) The court’s discretion will usually be exercised liberally so as not to deprive a party of the right to assert a meritorious cause of action or defense. The policy favoring amendment is so strong that d........
You can see and manage all of your alerts under Settings -> Alerts
Add to your subscription and access more dockets and more documents!
Your subscription was successfully upgraded
Please wait a moment while we load this page.