Defendant’s (Bank of America, N.A.) Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Adjudication is DENIED as to Issues 1-5, and GRANTED as to Issue 6. Defendant’s Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED.
Plaintiff’s objections are SUSTAINED. Defendant’s evidentiary objections do not comply with California Rules of Court, rule 3.1354(c).
Defendant’s Notice seeks summary judgment and summary adjudication of six issues.
Defendant seeks to establish that the causes of action have no merit based on affirmative defenses raised in its answer. (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd.(f)(1).) Code of Civil Procedure section 437c, subdivision (p)(2), states, in relevant part, “A defendant . . . has met his or her burden of showing that a cause of action has no merit if that party has shown . . . that there is a complete defense to that cause of action. Once the defendant . . . has met that burden, the burden shifts to the plaintiff . . . to show that a triable issue of one or more m