Search anything: judges, parties, opposing counsel, motion types, legal issues
(Subscribe to View)
Track Rulings In Case
June 20, 2021
Orange County, CA
Jan 17, 2020
Nov 15, 2019
Aug 16, 2019
May 17, 2019
Velazquez Vs Kia Motors America Inc.
Malin Vs Ambry Genetics Corporation
Long Beach Memorial Medical Center, Vs. Kaiser Foundation Helath Plan, Inc.
Lothenbach Properties, Iv, Llc Vs. 33 Bay Drive Property, Llc
Parra V. Underwood
Ramirez V Hit Mobile, Inc.
Devone Vs. Baker & Hostetier Llp
Valle De Nieto V. Bristol Industries, Inc.
Adolph Vs. Uber Technologies, Inc
The People Of The State Of California, Acting By And Through The Department Of Transportation Vs. Laguna Hills Investment Company, L.P.
6-20-2019 at 1:30 PM Draft Proposed Judgment Duarte’s proposed judgment and writ (with the accompanying strike-through permit) go beyond what the Court ordered. The Court did not determine that the NEL requirements were improper, only that Respondents failed to comply with the CWC § 13241 in adopting the NEL requirements. See Decision at 10:9-18:14, including the final sentence: “Put differently, in the words of the California Supreme Court, Respondents’ decision in approving the 2012 Permit is not supported by facts essential to sustain its decision. Environmental Protection Information Center, supra at 516-517.” The Court has also again reviewed CCP § 1094.5 (the section invoked by Petitioners) regarding judgment on a writ. The relevant subsection is (f) which reads: (f) The court shall enter judgment either commanding respondent to set aside the order or decision, or denying the writ. Where the judgment commands that the order or decision be set asi........
Your alert tracking was succesfully added. We will email you
when new changes related to are available.
You can see and mange all your Tracking alerts under Alert Settings
Add to your subscription and access more dockets and more documents!
Your subscription was successfully upgraded
Please wait a moment while we load this page.