No tentative ruling.
Parties should be prepared to discuss whether Defendant and Cross-Complainant James G. Caringella has met his burden to show “(1) that [its] claim is one upon which an attachment may be issued and (2) the probable validity of such claim.” (Bank of America v. Salinas Nissan, Inc. (1989) 207 Cal.App.3d 260, 271.)
Hearing Date
August 07, 2020
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
No tentative ruling.
Parties should be prepared to discuss whether Defendant and Cross-Complainant James G. Caringella has met his burden to show “(1) that [its] claim is one upon which an attachment may be issued and (2) the probable validity of such claim.” (Bank of America v. Salinas Nissan, Inc. (1989) 207 Cal.App.3d 260, 271.)