TENTATIVE RULING:
The court GRANTS the motion to seal defendants’ Exhibit G and plaintiff’s Exhibit 8, 22, 23, 24, and 25.
The motion to seal defendants’ Exhibit F and plaintiff’s Exhibits 7, 9-20, and 26-28 is DENIED.
Before the court are two motions. The first is an application to seal that was filed with plaintiff RSI Insurance Brokers, Inc.’s (“RSI’s”) opposition to the motions for summary adjudication submitted by defendants Hartley Cylke Pacific Insurance Services, Inc. (“HCP”), James Hawes, Robert King, Kathy Oakley, and Lucy Geer. This application sought to seal, in their entirety, RSI’s Exhibits 6-28 filed in opposition to the motions for summary adjudication. That application was set by the court for hearing on this date after the motions for summary adjudication were heard. The second is a noticed motion to seal filed by RSI on 10/17/17, which seeks to seal a more limited universe of documents in a more narrowly tailored manner. The court presumes that plaintiff’s previous a