Search anything: judges, parties, opposing counsel, motion types, legal issues
David R CHAFFEE
(Subscribe to View)
Track Rulings In Case
November 18, 2016
Orange County, CA
Valadez Vs Costco Wholesale Corporation
Doppes Vs California Scents, Llc
Gonzalez Vs Cedar Fair Lp
Ali Vs Hsu
Williams Vs 99 Cents Only Stores
Zager Vs Hyundai Motor America
Young Vs Hsbc Bank Usa, An Us Corporation
Sikander Vs Martinez
Sun Maita, Inc. Vs Maita
Nederlander Vs Iverson Yoakum Papiano & Hatch
I. Respondents’ Motion for New Trial Respondents Jim and Deborah Stevenson and Abel Mares and Amanda Holden-Mares move for a new trial under CCP 657 (5) and (6). The court DENIES the motion for the reasons set forth below and in the Opposition filed by Petitioners Patti L. Gerhard and Kathy Gardner. A. Burden of Proof A party may move to set aside a verdict or judgment, and to hold a new trial for any cause materially affecting his or her substantial rights. (CCP 657.) A trial court has broad discretion in ruling on the new trial motion, and on appeal the trial court's exercise of discretion must be accorded great deference. (Rayii v. Gatica (2013) 218 Cal.App.4th 1402, 1415.) The moving party bears the burden of proof. (Donovan v. Poway Unified School Dist. (2008) 167 Cal.App.4th 567, 625.) In ruling on the motion, the court must consider the entire record. (Casella v. Southwest Dealer Services, Inc. (2007) 157 Cal.App.4th 1127, 1159.) “A trial........
Your alert tracking was succesfully added. We will email you
when new changes related to are available.
You can see and mange all your Tracking alerts under Alert Settings
Add to your subscription and access more dockets and more documents!
Your subscription was successfully upgraded
Please wait a moment while we load this page.