The Court does not find any of the Requests or Interrogatories to be conjunctive or disjunctive, so Plaintiff's objection in that regard is overruled. However, the Court finds that the remaining objections stated by Plaintiff have merit. Specifically, Code of Civil Procedure Section 2033.060(d), provides that "[e]ach request for admission shall be full and complete in and of itself. No preface or instruction shall be included with a set of admission requests unless it has been approved [by the Judicial Council]", therefore, the various terms are undefined without resorting to the preliminary definitions, which is improper. Further, by referring to an attached document described as "1992 CONTRACT", Defendant is requiring Plaintiff to not only respond to the Requests/Interrogatories, but also verify the authenticity of a document, which may or may not have even been attached. This is improper and this objection therefore also has merit. Defendant's Motion to Compel Further Responses to R