ELEANORE ROSEN, ET AL., Plaintiff(s), vs. JOSHUA RIGGS, ET AL., Defendant(s).
Case No.: BC628452
[TENTATIVE] ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
1. Background Facts
Plaintiffs, Eleanore and Stephen Rosen filed this action against Defendants, Joshua and Ellyne Riggs for damages arising out of an automobile accident.
2. Prior Scheduled Hearing
On 1/25/17, Defendants had a motion to compel Plaintiffs’ depositions on calendar. The issue on the motion was whether Plaintiffs should be required to travel from their home in Tarzana down to Defense Counsel’s office in Orange County for their depositions. Prior to the 1/25/17 hearing date, the Court issued a tentative ruling. The tentative ruling indicated:
On 11/28/16, Plaintiffs filed a motion for a protective order concerning their depositions. The motion is scheduled to be heard on 2/09/17. The Court wishes to hear the two motions together, and therefore continues the hearing on this motion to 2/09/17 at 1:30 p.m. to be hear
Hearing Date
February 09, 2017
Type
Motor Vehicle - PI/PD/WD (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
ELEANORE ROSEN, ET AL., Plaintiff(s), vs. JOSHUA RIGGS, ET AL., Defendant(s).
Case No.: BC628452
[TENTATIVE] ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
1. Background Facts
Plaintiffs, Eleanore and Stephen Rosen filed this action against Defendants, Joshua and Ellyne Riggs for damages arising out of an automobile accident.
2. Prior Scheduled Hearing
On 1/25/17, Defendants had a motion to compel Plaintiffs’ depositions on calendar. The issue on the motion was whether Plaintiffs should be required to travel from their home in Tarzana down to Defense Counsel’s office in Orange County for their depositions. Prior to the 1/25/17 hearing date, the Court issued a tentative ruling. The tentative ruling indicated:
On 11/28/16, Plaintiffs filed a motion for a protective order concerning their depositions. The motion is scheduled to be heard on 2/09/17. The Court wishes to hear the two motions together, and therefore continues the hearing on this motion to 2/09/17 at 1:30 p.m. to be hear