Case Number:
20STCV14269
Hearing Date:
January 15, 2021
Dept:
78
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles
Department
78
michael lee,
et al
.
;
Plaintiffs,
vs.
CONSTANZE B. HANCOCK, et al.
;
Defendants.
Case No.:
20STCV14269
Hearing Date:
January 15, 2021
[TENTATIVE] RULING RE:
PLAINTIFFS MICHAEL lee and tanya lee’s motion for interlocutory judgment of partition and appointment of referee
Plaintiffs Michael Lee and Tanya Lee’s Motion for Interlocutory Judgment of Partition and Appointment of Referee is DENIED.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
This is an action for accounting and partition. The Complaint alleges as follows. Plaintiffs Michael Lee and Tanya Lee own the subject property. (Compl. ¶ 12.) They acquired the ownership interest from Tanya Lee’s mother, Defendant Constanze B. Hancock (“Constanze”), who acquired
Hearing Date
January 15, 2021
Type
Other Real Property (not eminent domain, landlord/tenant, foreclosure) (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Case Number:
20STCV14269
Hearing Date:
January 15, 2021
Dept:
78
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles
Department
78
michael lee,
et al
.
;
Plaintiffs,
vs.
CONSTANZE B. HANCOCK, et al.
;
Defendants.
Case No.:
20STCV14269
Hearing Date:
January 15, 2021
[TENTATIVE] RULING RE:
PLAINTIFFS MICHAEL lee and tanya lee’s motion for interlocutory judgment of partition and appointment of referee
Plaintiffs Michael Lee and Tanya Lee’s Motion for Interlocutory Judgment of Partition and Appointment of Referee is DENIED.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
This is an action for accounting and partition. The Complaint alleges as follows. Plaintiffs Michael Lee and Tanya Lee own the subject property. (Compl. ¶ 12.) They acquired the ownership interest from Tanya Lee’s mother, Defendant Constanze B. Hancock (“Constanze”), who acquired