Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles
Linda Marie De La Riva, Plaintiff,
Case No. 20STCV12972 v. [Tentative] Ruling
Kia Motors, Inc., Defendant.
Hearing Date: September 22, 2020
Department 49, Judge Stuart M. Rice
(1) Demurrer
(2) Motion to Strike
Moving Party: Defendant Kia Motors America, Inc.
Responding Party: Plaintiff Linda Marie de la Riva
Ruling: Defendant’s demurrer is overruled, its motion to strike denied. Defendant has 30 days to file an answer to the complaint.
Meet and Confer
Defendant has filed a declaration showing compliance with the meet and confer requirements set forth in Code of Civil Procedure section 430.41. (See Declaration of Tucker Dowling.)
Demurrer
Defendant demurs to each cause of action in plaintiff’s complaint for: (1) violation of subdivision (d) of Civil Code section 1793.2; (2) violation of subdivision (b) of section 1793.2; (3) violation of subdivision (a)(3) of Civil Code section 1793.2; (4) breach of express warranty under
Hearing Date
September 22, 2020
Type
Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles
Linda Marie De La Riva, Plaintiff,
Case No. 20STCV12972 v. [Tentative] Ruling
Kia Motors, Inc., Defendant.
Hearing Date: September 22, 2020
Department 49, Judge Stuart M. Rice
(1) Demurrer
(2) Motion to Strike
Moving Party: Defendant Kia Motors America, Inc.
Responding Party: Plaintiff Linda Marie de la Riva
Ruling: Defendant’s demurrer is overruled, its motion to strike denied. Defendant has 30 days to file an answer to the complaint.
Meet and Confer
Defendant has filed a declaration showing compliance with the meet and confer requirements set forth in Code of Civil Procedure section 430.41. (See Declaration of Tucker Dowling.)
Demurrer
Defendant demurs to each cause of action in plaintiff’s complaint for: (1) violation of subdivision (d) of Civil Code section 1793.2; (2) violation of subdivision (b) of section 1793.2; (3) violation of subdivision (a)(3) of Civil Code section 1793.2; (4) breach of express warranty under