HEARING DATE: October 19, 2020
CASE NUMBER: 20STCV09169
CASE NAME: James Lee, an individual v. Selan Law Firm, a Professional Corporation, et al.
MOVING PARTIES: Defendants, Selan Law Firm, a Professional Corporation, Lisa F. Selan and Robert E. Selan
OPPOSING PARTY: Plaintiff, James Lee
TRIAL DATE: January 11, 2022
PROOF OF SERVICE: OK
MOTION: Defendants’ Demurrer to the First Amended Complaint
OPPOSITION: October 5, 2020
REPLY: October 9, 2020
TENTATIVE: Defendants’ demurrer is SUSTAINED. Plaintiff is given 20 days leave to amend from this date. Defendants are to give notice.
This action arises out of Plaintiff’s, James Lee’s (“Plaintiff”) alleged retention of Defendants, Selan Law Firm, a Professional Corporation (“Selan Firm”), Lisa F. Selan (“Ms. Selan”) and Robert E. Selan (“Mr. Selan”) (collectively, “Defendants”) to provide legal services. Plaintiff alleges Defendants charged unconscionable legal fees. Further, Plaintiff alleges that Defendants failed to adequately a
Hearing Date
October 19, 2020
Type
Legal Malpractice (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
HEARING DATE: October 19, 2020
CASE NUMBER: 20STCV09169
CASE NAME: James Lee, an individual v. Selan Law Firm, a Professional Corporation, et al.
MOVING PARTIES: Defendants, Selan Law Firm, a Professional Corporation, Lisa F. Selan and Robert E. Selan
OPPOSING PARTY: Plaintiff, James Lee
TRIAL DATE: January 11, 2022
PROOF OF SERVICE: OK
MOTION: Defendants’ Demurrer to the First Amended Complaint
OPPOSITION: October 5, 2020
REPLY: October 9, 2020
TENTATIVE: Defendants’ demurrer is SUSTAINED. Plaintiff is given 20 days leave to amend from this date. Defendants are to give notice.
This action arises out of Plaintiff’s, James Lee’s (“Plaintiff”) alleged retention of Defendants, Selan Law Firm, a Professional Corporation (“Selan Firm”), Lisa F. Selan (“Ms. Selan”) and Robert E. Selan (“Mr. Selan”) (collectively, “Defendants”) to provide legal services. Plaintiff alleges Defendants charged unconscionable legal fees. Further, Plaintiff alleges that Defendants failed to adequately a