HEARING DATE: November 20, 2020
CASE NUMBER: 20STCV04213
CASE NAME: Miklos Medvei v. Hope Enterprises, LLC, et al.
TRIAL DATE: None
PROOF OF SERVICE: OK
MOTION: Motion to Quash Service of Summons
MOVING PARTY: Specially Appearing Cross-Defendant, Adrien Medvei
OPPOSING PARTY: Defendant and Cross-Complainant, Hope Enterprises, LLC
OPPOSITION: October 29, 2020
REPLY: November 13, 2020
TENTATIVE: Ms. Medvei’s motion to quash is granted. Service of summons and the FACC is ordered quashed as to Ms. Medvei. Ms. Medvei is to give notice.
MOTION: Demurrer to First Amended Cross-Complaint; Motion to Strike Portions of First Amended Cross-Complaint
MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant, Miklos Medvei
OPPOSING PARTY: Defendant and Cross-Complainant, Hope Enterprises, LLC
OPPOSITION: November 4, 2020
REPLY: November 13, 2020
TENTATIVE: Mr. Medvei’s demurrer is overruled as to the first cause of action and sustained as to the second cause of action. Mr. Medvei’s motion to stri
Hearing Date
November 20, 2020
Type
Other Commercial/Business Tort (not fraud/ breach of contract) (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
HEARING DATE: November 20, 2020
CASE NUMBER: 20STCV04213
CASE NAME: Miklos Medvei v. Hope Enterprises, LLC, et al.
TRIAL DATE: None
PROOF OF SERVICE: OK
MOTION: Motion to Quash Service of Summons
MOVING PARTY: Specially Appearing Cross-Defendant, Adrien Medvei
OPPOSING PARTY: Defendant and Cross-Complainant, Hope Enterprises, LLC
OPPOSITION: October 29, 2020
REPLY: November 13, 2020
TENTATIVE: Ms. Medvei’s motion to quash is granted. Service of summons and the FACC is ordered quashed as to Ms. Medvei. Ms. Medvei is to give notice.
MOTION: Demurrer to First Amended Cross-Complaint; Motion to Strike Portions of First Amended Cross-Complaint
MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant, Miklos Medvei
OPPOSING PARTY: Defendant and Cross-Complainant, Hope Enterprises, LLC
OPPOSITION: November 4, 2020
REPLY: November 13, 2020
TENTATIVE: Mr. Medvei’s demurrer is overruled as to the first cause of action and sustained as to the second cause of action. Mr. Medvei’s motion to stri