CASE NAME: Justin Liu v. Jean Liu, et al.
CASE NUMBER: 20SMCV00486
MOTION: Defendant/Cross-Complainant JCTLA’s Motion To Compel Mark Saltzman to Comply With Deposition Subpoena For Production of Business Records
HEARING DATE: 10/30/2020
Background & Discovery Dispute
On March 26, 2020, Plaintiff Justin Liu filed a complaint against JCTLA Investment Corporation (“JCTLA”), Jean Liu, and Does 1-20 for malicious prosecution, unjust enrichment, and breach of fiduciary duty. Plaintiff alleges that Liu Tong Kuang (“Mr. Liu”) was, at all times relevant hereto, a director of JCTLA. (Id. ¶ 17.) Plaintiff was hired by Defendants “to renovate a home on the Property [at 433 South Beverly Glen Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90024] and to get it rented and then manage all facets of the Property.” (Id. ¶¶ 16, 18.) Plaintiff further alleges that “Mr. Liu, in his capacity as a director of JCTLA, continued to represent to Plaintiff that Defendants would pay him for his services from the commence
Hearing Date
October 30, 2020
Type
Other Complaint (non-tort/non-complex) (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
CASE NAME: Justin Liu v. Jean Liu, et al.
CASE NUMBER: 20SMCV00486
MOTION: Defendant/Cross-Complainant JCTLA’s Motion To Compel Mark Saltzman to Comply With Deposition Subpoena For Production of Business Records
HEARING DATE: 10/30/2020
Background & Discovery Dispute
On March 26, 2020, Plaintiff Justin Liu filed a complaint against JCTLA Investment Corporation (“JCTLA”), Jean Liu, and Does 1-20 for malicious prosecution, unjust enrichment, and breach of fiduciary duty. Plaintiff alleges that Liu Tong Kuang (“Mr. Liu”) was, at all times relevant hereto, a director of JCTLA. (Id. ¶ 17.) Plaintiff was hired by Defendants “to renovate a home on the Property [at 433 South Beverly Glen Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90024] and to get it rented and then manage all facets of the Property.” (Id. ¶¶ 16, 18.) Plaintiff further alleges that “Mr. Liu, in his capacity as a director of JCTLA, continued to represent to Plaintiff that Defendants would pay him for his services from the commence