INTRODUCTION

Defendant D.D. Technology, Inc. (DD) moves to strike Paragraph 40 in the cause of action for conversion and the prayer for punitive damages.

FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

This case arises from a contractual relationship between the parties. Plaintiff is “operated and managed” by “acting President” Gordon Grange. (Paragraph 4)

Defendant “is in the business of decoking/descaling in the pigging industry (essentially involves performing cleaning and maintenance work in oil refineries) . . .” (Paragraph 5)

“In or about 2000, Mr. Grange incorporated PLAINTIFF which subsequently

entered into a business relationship with DEFENDANT pursuant to which Mr. Grange, on behalf of PLAINTIFF, introduced DEFENDANT into the California market and generated business in exchange for compensation in the form of a seventeen percent (17%) commission. This arrangement continued for approximately eight years.” (Paragraph 7)

The formal agreement is Exhibit A to the complaint.

“The AGREEMENT was for a f