Nature of Proceedings: Req. for Order: Modification Child Support
Petitioner’s Order to Show Cause re Contempt
Respondent’s Request for Order for Modification of Child Support
Attorneys
For Petitioner: Miles Goldrick
For Respondent: Keri S. Kettle
Ruling:
1. Petitioner’s unopposed request for an evidentiary hearing is GRANTED; counsel and the Court will set dates at the 11/14 hearing; bring your calendars and the calendars of your witnesses.
2. Petitioner’s unopposed request that the Court take judicial notice of the [unpublished] Court of Appeal Decision filed April 18, 2011, in this case involving a prior decision of this Judge in this case, is GRANTED.
3. Petitioner’s unopposed objection to a “Guardian Ad Litem‘s Brief” which was purportedly submitted to the Circuit Court, Second Judicial Circuit, State of South Dakota, County of Lincoln, because the Brief is (a) hearsay and unauthenticated; it (b) also makes allegations that are untrue; and (c) due process requires that t
Hearing Date
November 14, 2017
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Nature of Proceedings: Req. for Order: Modification Child Support
Petitioner’s Order to Show Cause re Contempt
Respondent’s Request for Order for Modification of Child Support
Attorneys
For Petitioner: Miles Goldrick
For Respondent: Keri S. Kettle
Ruling:
1. Petitioner’s unopposed request for an evidentiary hearing is GRANTED; counsel and the Court will set dates at the 11/14 hearing; bring your calendars and the calendars of your witnesses.
2. Petitioner’s unopposed request that the Court take judicial notice of the [unpublished] Court of Appeal Decision filed April 18, 2011, in this case involving a prior decision of this Judge in this case, is GRANTED.
3. Petitioner’s unopposed objection to a “Guardian Ad Litem‘s Brief” which was purportedly submitted to the Circuit Court, Second Judicial Circuit, State of South Dakota, County of Lincoln, because the Brief is (a) hearsay and unauthenticated; it (b) also makes allegations that are untrue; and (c) due process requires that t