Plaintiff’s Motion for Order Setting Aside Dismissal and Set Case for Trial – DENIED, without prejudice.
The proof of service demonstrates that the motion was served with only 14 court days’ notice, which is insufficient pursuant to Code Civ. Proc. §1005(b).
In addition, the Court notes that the motion appears to consist of testimonial and documentary evidence which has not been properly submitted and is, therefore, inadmissible. (Code Civ. Proc. §2015.5) Moreover, the information provided does not appear to sufficiently describe the factual grounds upon which Plaintiff seeks discretionary relief pursuant to Code Civ. Proc. §473(b).
CV-19-002751 – MERCADO, MARIA VS. RIVERA, RAMON – Plaintiff’s Attorney’s Motion to be Relieved as Counsel – DENIED, without prejudice.
Counsel fails to demonstrate proof of service on Plaintiff Ulises Mercado. Likewise, the notice does not indicate that the motion is directed as against said Plaintiff. In addition, the motion inexplicably describes the subj
Hearing Date
November 22, 2019
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Order Setting Aside Dismissal and Set Case for Trial – DENIED, without prejudice.
The proof of service demonstrates that the motion was served with only 14 court days’ notice, which is insufficient pursuant to Code Civ. Proc. §1005(b).
In addition, the Court notes that the motion appears to consist of testimonial and documentary evidence which has not been properly submitted and is, therefore, inadmissible. (Code Civ. Proc. §2015.5) Moreover, the information provided does not appear to sufficiently describe the factual grounds upon which Plaintiff seeks discretionary relief pursuant to Code Civ. Proc. §473(b).
CV-19-002751 – MERCADO, MARIA VS. RIVERA, RAMON – Plaintiff’s Attorney’s Motion to be Relieved as Counsel – DENIED, without prejudice.
Counsel fails to demonstrate proof of service on Plaintiff Ulises Mercado. Likewise, the notice does not indicate that the motion is directed as against said Plaintiff. In addition, the motion inexplicably describes the subj