Search anything: judges, parties, opposing counsel, motion types, legal issues
Brian C. Walsh
(Subscribe to View)
Track Rulings In Case
November 5, 2020
Santa Clara County, CA
May 17, 2019
Jun 08, 2018
Apr 06, 2018
In Re Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. Shareholder Litigation
Nicholas Robinson V. Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc., Et Al.
Ruben Mendoza V. City Sports Club, Et Al.
Mohammad Valikhani V. Cep America-California, Et Al.
Donald Markham V. Quik Stop Markets, Inc., Et Al.
Adam Holt V. Blue Bottle Coffee, Inc., Et Al.
Melbert Magpugay V. Harbor Electronics, Inc., Et Al.
Alysha Jaramillo V. Marriott International, Inc., Et Al.
Hector Luna V. Triple Canopy, Inc., Et Al.
Vijayalakshmi Kanna V. Tranzeal, Inc., Et Al.
This is a class action alleging that the City of Palo Alto unlawfully imposed a Utility Users Tax (“UUT”) on customers of telephone service providers. Before the Court is plaintiff’s motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. I. Factual and Procedural Background According to the allegations of the Class Action Complaint (“Complaint”), in 1987, the City adopted an ordinance establishing the UUT, which authorizes a local tax for telephone services. (Compl., ¶¶ 8-9.) The UUT is automatically charged to City taxpayers each month by telephone providers as part of their normal billing practice on behalf of the City. (Id. at ¶¶ 1, 9.) For purposes of the UUT ordinance, the City adopted the definition of taxable telephone services prescribed by federal statute in relation to excise taxes. (Compl., ¶ 10.) Beginning in 2005, five federal appellate courts held the federal excise tax statute did not permit the Internal Reven........
Apr 06, 2018
Your alert tracking was succesfully added. We will email you
when new changes related to are available.
You can see and mange all your Tracking alerts under Alert Settings
Add to your subscription and access more dockets and more documents!
Your subscription was successfully upgraded
Please wait a moment while we load this page.