9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
12 In Re MCAFEE, INC. SHAREHOLDER Lead LITIGATION 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Consolidated action, including: FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 14 Greenberg c. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County
Superior Court, 15 Colwell v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County
16 Superior Court, Faulkner v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County 17 Superior Court, Korsinsky v. Bass, Santa Clara County Superior 18 Court, 19
20 This Document Relates To:
21 ALL ACTIONS.
23 The motion by defendants Intel Corporation (“Intel”) and McAfee, Inc. (“McAfee”) for
24 summary judgment comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle on October
25 12, 2018, at 1:30 p.m. in Department 5. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as follows:
26 I. Factual and Procedural Background
27 This consolidated class action—originally brought by plaintiffs Fred Greenberg
28 (“Greenberg”), Meryl Faulkner, Jack Arthur Colwell (“Colwell”), and Gersh Korsinsky
TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGME
Hearing Date
October 12, 2018
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
12 In Re MCAFEE, INC. SHAREHOLDER Lead LITIGATION 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Consolidated action, including: FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 14 Greenberg c. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County
Superior Court, 15 Colwell v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County
16 Superior Court, Faulkner v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County 17 Superior Court, Korsinsky v. Bass, Santa Clara County Superior 18 Court, 19
20 This Document Relates To:
21 ALL ACTIONS.
23 The motion by defendants Intel Corporation (“Intel”) and McAfee, Inc. (“McAfee”) for
24 summary judgment comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle on October
25 12, 2018, at 1:30 p.m. in Department 5. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as follows:
26 I. Factual and Procedural Background
27 This consolidated class action—originally brought by plaintiffs Fred Greenberg
28 (“Greenberg”), Meryl Faulkner, Jack Arthur Colwell (“Colwell”), and Gersh Korsinsky
TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGME