LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT – SOUTHWEST DISTRICT
Honorable Gary Y. Tanaka Thursday, July 9, 2020 Department B Calendar No. 4
PROCEEDINGS
Joseph K. Cofey v. P.L.S. Check Cashing, et al.
19TRCV00973
PLS Check Cashers of California, Inc.’s, erroneously sued herein as People’s Location Services Ca. Corporation Demurrer to First Amended Complaint
TENTATIVE RULING
PLS Check Cashers of California, Inc.’s, erroneously sued herein as People’s Location Services Ca. Corporation Demurrer to First Amended Complaint is sustained with 20 days leave to amend.
Meet and Confer
Defendant set forth a meet and confer declaration in sufficient compliance with CCP 430.41. (Decl., Jemal K. Yarbrough, ¶¶ 3-10.)
Demurrer
A demurrer tests the sufficiency of a complaint as a matter of law and raises only questions of law. (Schmidt v. Foundation Health (1995) 35 Cal.App.4th 1702, 1706.) In testing the sufficiency of the complaint, the court must assume the truth of (1) the properly pleaded factual allega
Hearing Date
July 09, 2020
Type
Other Professional Malpractice (not medical or legal) (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT – SOUTHWEST DISTRICT
Honorable Gary Y. Tanaka Thursday, July 9, 2020 Department B Calendar No. 4
PROCEEDINGS
Joseph K. Cofey v. P.L.S. Check Cashing, et al.
19TRCV00973
PLS Check Cashers of California, Inc.’s, erroneously sued herein as People’s Location Services Ca. Corporation Demurrer to First Amended Complaint
TENTATIVE RULING
PLS Check Cashers of California, Inc.’s, erroneously sued herein as People’s Location Services Ca. Corporation Demurrer to First Amended Complaint is sustained with 20 days leave to amend.
Meet and Confer
Defendant set forth a meet and confer declaration in sufficient compliance with CCP 430.41. (Decl., Jemal K. Yarbrough, ¶¶ 3-10.)
Demurrer
A demurrer tests the sufficiency of a complaint as a matter of law and raises only questions of law. (Schmidt v. Foundation Health (1995) 35 Cal.App.4th 1702, 1706.) In testing the sufficiency of the complaint, the court must assume the truth of (1) the properly pleaded factual allega