SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
MAYWOOD INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC, Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF MAYWOOD, etc, Defendant.
CASE NO.: 19STCV44946
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT; MOTION TO STRIKE
Date: March 18, 2020
Time: 8:30 a.m.
Dept. 56
CMC: April 13, 2020
MOVING PARTY: Defendant City of Maywood
RESPONDING PARTY: Plaintiff Maywood Investment Group, LLC
The Court has considered the moving, opposition, and reply papers.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defendant arising from alleged wrongful actions of Defendant with respect to Plaintiff opening up a cannabis business. Plaintiff’s complaint seeks injunctive relief. Plaintiff’s complaint does not explicitly allege any causes of action against Defendant.
Defendant filed a demurrer to the complaint on the grounds that: (1) the complaint’s allegations are ambiguous and unintelligible; and (2) the complaint fails to state facts sufficient to constitute
Hearing Date
March 18, 2020
Type
Other Commercial Complaint (non-tort/non-complex) (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
MAYWOOD INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC, Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF MAYWOOD, etc, Defendant.
CASE NO.: 19STCV44946
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT; MOTION TO STRIKE
Date: March 18, 2020
Time: 8:30 a.m.
Dept. 56
CMC: April 13, 2020
MOVING PARTY: Defendant City of Maywood
RESPONDING PARTY: Plaintiff Maywood Investment Group, LLC
The Court has considered the moving, opposition, and reply papers.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defendant arising from alleged wrongful actions of Defendant with respect to Plaintiff opening up a cannabis business. Plaintiff’s complaint seeks injunctive relief. Plaintiff’s complaint does not explicitly allege any causes of action against Defendant.
Defendant filed a demurrer to the complaint on the grounds that: (1) the complaint’s allegations are ambiguous and unintelligible; and (2) the complaint fails to state facts sufficient to constitute