Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles
Department 78
ALDEMA REUVENI; Plaintiff, vs. JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.; Defendants.
Case No.: 19STCV39992
Hearing Date: March 16, 2020
[TENTATIVE] RULING RE:
DEFENDANT AMIR ABRAMOV’S DEMURRER TO THE COMPLAINT
DEFENDANT YOLANDA VINDEL’S DEMURRER TO THE COMPLAINT
Defendant Yolanda Vindel’s Demurrer to the Complaint is SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to the First and Second Causes of Action and OVERRULED as to the Third Cause of Action.
Defendant Amir Abramov’s Demurrer to the Third Cause of Action of the Complaint is OVERRULED.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
This is an action for breach of contract. The Complaint alleges as follows. Plaintiff Aldema Reuveni’s (“Reuveni”) husband Yair Reuveni (“Yair”) purchased a life insurance policy issued by Defendant John Hancock Life Insurance Company (“John Hancock”) in July 2017 with Reuveni as the beneficiary. (Compl. ¶ 8.) Defendant Amir Abramov (“Abramov”) sold the policy to Y
Hearing Date
March 16, 2020
Type
Insurance Coverage (not complex) (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles
Department 78
ALDEMA REUVENI; Plaintiff, vs. JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.; Defendants.
Case No.: 19STCV39992
Hearing Date: March 16, 2020
[TENTATIVE] RULING RE:
DEFENDANT AMIR ABRAMOV’S DEMURRER TO THE COMPLAINT
DEFENDANT YOLANDA VINDEL’S DEMURRER TO THE COMPLAINT
Defendant Yolanda Vindel’s Demurrer to the Complaint is SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to the First and Second Causes of Action and OVERRULED as to the Third Cause of Action.
Defendant Amir Abramov’s Demurrer to the Third Cause of Action of the Complaint is OVERRULED.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
This is an action for breach of contract. The Complaint alleges as follows. Plaintiff Aldema Reuveni’s (“Reuveni”) husband Yair Reuveni (“Yair”) purchased a life insurance policy issued by Defendant John Hancock Life Insurance Company (“John Hancock”) in July 2017 with Reuveni as the beneficiary. (Compl. ¶ 8.) Defendant Amir Abramov (“Abramov”) sold the policy to Y