#13 TENTATIVE RULING 9:15 a.m., Tuesday, January 5, 2021
DONG HE LI v. BRIAN JONGMIN KIM, et al. [19STCV37036]
RULING ON DEMURRER OF DEFENDANTS BRIAN JONGMIN KIM and JINA KIM TO CAUSES OF ACTION 3-4 OF PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
MEET & CONFER: DEFECTIVE – Counsel’s decl states that opposing counsel didn’t respond to MP’s counsel’s efforts re a telephonic M&C
or to counsel’s email noting defects in the Complaint
BACKGROUND: Action for br/K, quantum meruit, fraud, negl misrep. -
TIMELINE:
o/a 9/30/16: Plaintiff allegedly entered into a written K w/defs KIM, pursuant to which Plaintiff was to provide labor/materials in connection with construction of certain improvements to Defendants’ residential property. Plaintiff alleges that after a number of changes were made and problems arose during construction, the parties disagreed re the
amount owed, and that Defendants still owe “not less than $100K...”
10/15/19: Plaintiff filed its Complaint, asserting 4 C/As [without indicating the defe
Hearing Date
January 05, 2021
Type
Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
#13 TENTATIVE RULING 9:15 a.m., Tuesday, January 5, 2021
DONG HE LI v. BRIAN JONGMIN KIM, et al. [19STCV37036]
RULING ON DEMURRER OF DEFENDANTS BRIAN JONGMIN KIM and JINA KIM TO CAUSES OF ACTION 3-4 OF PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
MEET & CONFER: DEFECTIVE – Counsel’s decl states that opposing counsel didn’t respond to MP’s counsel’s efforts re a telephonic M&C
or to counsel’s email noting defects in the Complaint
BACKGROUND: Action for br/K, quantum meruit, fraud, negl misrep. -
TIMELINE:
o/a 9/30/16: Plaintiff allegedly entered into a written K w/defs KIM, pursuant to which Plaintiff was to provide labor/materials in connection with construction of certain improvements to Defendants’ residential property. Plaintiff alleges that after a number of changes were made and problems arose during construction, the parties disagreed re the
amount owed, and that Defendants still owe “not less than $100K...”
10/15/19: Plaintiff filed its Complaint, asserting 4 C/As [without indicating the defe