SUBJECT: (3) Motions to Compel Discovery

Moving Party: Plaintiff Catherine M. Pacas

Resp. Party: None

The motion to deem Requests for Admission admitted is GRANTED.

The motion to compel responses to request for production of documents, set one, is GRANTED.

The motion to compel responses to written interrogatories, set one, is GRANTED.

The Court declines to award sanctions.

PRELIMINARY COMMENTS:

This write-up cites to the Interrogatory Motion and Lee Declaration, unless indicated otherwise, as all three motions are substantially the same.

The Court recognizes that, to the pro per litigant, “interrogatories, requests for admissions, law and motion proceedings, and the like” are “baffling devices.” (Bruno v. Superior Court (1990) 219 Cal.App.3d 1359, 1363, quoting Burley v. Stein (1974) 40 Cal.App.3d 752, 755, fn. 3.)

Nonetheless, “[a] party proceeding in propria persona ‘is to be treated like any other party and is entitled to the same, but no greater[,] consideration than othe