SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
KYSA PAUL, etc., Plaintiff, vs. TARGET CORPORATION, etc., et al., Defendants.
CASE NO.: 19STCV25148
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINITFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
Date: February 3, 2020
Time: 8:30 a.m.
Dept. 56
IDC: April 1, 2020
MOVING PARTY: Defendant Target Corporation (“Moving Defendant”)
RESPONDING PARTY: Plaintiff Kysa Paul
The Court has considered the moving, opposition, and reply papers.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff’s complaint arises from an alleged wrongful termination. On July 17, 2019, Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defendants alleging causes of action for: (1) discrimination on the basis of age in violation of FEHA; (2) harassment on the basis of age in violation of FEHA; (3) discrimination on the basis of gender in violation of FEHA; (4) harassment on the basis of gender in violation of FEHA; (5) discrimination on the basis of disability and/or medical conditio
Hearing Date
February 03, 2020
Type
Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
KYSA PAUL, etc., Plaintiff, vs. TARGET CORPORATION, etc., et al., Defendants.
CASE NO.: 19STCV25148
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINITFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
Date: February 3, 2020
Time: 8:30 a.m.
Dept. 56
IDC: April 1, 2020
MOVING PARTY: Defendant Target Corporation (“Moving Defendant”)
RESPONDING PARTY: Plaintiff Kysa Paul
The Court has considered the moving, opposition, and reply papers.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff’s complaint arises from an alleged wrongful termination. On July 17, 2019, Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defendants alleging causes of action for: (1) discrimination on the basis of age in violation of FEHA; (2) harassment on the basis of age in violation of FEHA; (3) discrimination on the basis of gender in violation of FEHA; (4) harassment on the basis of gender in violation of FEHA; (5) discrimination on the basis of disability and/or medical conditio