Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles
Department 36
VOLVO FINANCIAL SERVICES, a division of VFS US LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. COMMERCIAL WASTE SERVICES, INC., a California corporation; ARON PETROSIAN, an individual; and DOES 1-10,
Defendants.
Case No.: 19STCV25103
Hearing Date: 7/13/2020
[TENTATIVE] RULING RE: Motions to be Relieved as Counsel as to Defendant/Cross-Complainant Commercial Waste Services, Inc. and Defendant Aron Petrosian
COMMERCIAL WASTE SERVICES, INC., a California corporation,
Cross-Complainant,
v.
VOLVO ROAD MACHINERY INC., a Delaware corporation, doing business as Volvo Construction Equipment Services; and ROES 1-25,
Cross-Defendants.
Counsel David Lalazarian’s motions to be relieved as counsel are granted.
Relevant Law
The court has discretion to allow an attorney to withdraw, and such a motion should be granted provided that there is no prejudice to the client and it does not disrupt the orderly process of
Hearing Date
July 13, 2020
Type
Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles
Department 36
VOLVO FINANCIAL SERVICES, a division of VFS US LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. COMMERCIAL WASTE SERVICES, INC., a California corporation; ARON PETROSIAN, an individual; and DOES 1-10,
Defendants.
Case No.: 19STCV25103
Hearing Date: 7/13/2020
[TENTATIVE] RULING RE: Motions to be Relieved as Counsel as to Defendant/Cross-Complainant Commercial Waste Services, Inc. and Defendant Aron Petrosian
COMMERCIAL WASTE SERVICES, INC., a California corporation,
Cross-Complainant,
v.
VOLVO ROAD MACHINERY INC., a Delaware corporation, doing business as Volvo Construction Equipment Services; and ROES 1-25,
Cross-Defendants.
Counsel David Lalazarian’s motions to be relieved as counsel are granted.
Relevant Law
The court has discretion to allow an attorney to withdraw, and such a motion should be granted provided that there is no prejudice to the client and it does not disrupt the orderly process of