RM Global Textile, Inc., v. Mad Engine, LLC,
Judge Mary Strobel
Hearing: September 17, 2020
19STCV22119
Tentative Decision on Application for Writ of Attachment: GRANTED IN PART
Plaintiff RM Global Textile, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) moves for a writ of attachment against Defendant Mad Engine, LLC (“Defendant”) in the amount of $580,391.25.
Procedural History
On June 24, 2019, Plaintiff filed its complaint against Defendant for breach of contract, conversion, and common counts.
On June 15, 2019, Defendant filed an answer and a cross-complaint against Plaintiff. The answer includes an affirmative defense for offset. The cross-complaint is for breach of contract.
On December 27, 2019, Plaintiff filed its application for writ of attachment.
On February 24, 2020, the independent calendar court (Judge Draper) denied Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, or alternatively, summary adjudication.
Due to conditions and orders related to the spread of Covid-19, the hearing on the applicatio
Hearing Date
September 17, 2020
Type
Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
RM Global Textile, Inc., v. Mad Engine, LLC,
Judge Mary Strobel
Hearing: September 17, 2020
19STCV22119
Tentative Decision on Application for Writ of Attachment: GRANTED IN PART
Plaintiff RM Global Textile, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) moves for a writ of attachment against Defendant Mad Engine, LLC (“Defendant”) in the amount of $580,391.25.
Procedural History
On June 24, 2019, Plaintiff filed its complaint against Defendant for breach of contract, conversion, and common counts.
On June 15, 2019, Defendant filed an answer and a cross-complaint against Plaintiff. The answer includes an affirmative defense for offset. The cross-complaint is for breach of contract.
On December 27, 2019, Plaintiff filed its application for writ of attachment.
On February 24, 2020, the independent calendar court (Judge Draper) denied Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, or alternatively, summary adjudication.
Due to conditions and orders related to the spread of Covid-19, the hearing on the applicatio