Parties/Counsel Are Strongly Encouraged to Appear Telephonically
The Number of Persons Permitted In the Courtroom is Extremely Limited
Facial Masks/Coverings Are Mandatory for Courthouse/Courtroom Entry
Demurrer
MOVING PARTY: Defendants C&L Fashions and Designs, Inc.,
In Hwan Cho,
No Soon Lee, and
Un Yong Han
OPPOSITION: None
Plaintiff Doodu, Inc., (“Plaintiff”) is a women’s clothing wholesaler and
manufacturer. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants C&L Fashions and Designs, Inc., In Hwan
Cho, No Soon Lee, and Un Yong Han (collectively, “Defendants”) owed money from
ordering and receiving women’s clothes.
On August 19, 2019, Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint (“FAC”) against Defendants
alleging causes of action for:
Account Stated;
Open Book Account;
Fraud;
Account Stated;
Open Book Account;
Fraud.
On September 23, 2019, Defendants filed a demurrer and motion to strike.
Uncertainty: OVERRULED
Defendant argues that all six causes of action are vague, ambiguous,
Hearing Date
June 29, 2020
Type
Collections Case - Seller Plaintiff (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Parties/Counsel Are Strongly Encouraged to Appear Telephonically
The Number of Persons Permitted In the Courtroom is Extremely Limited
Facial Masks/Coverings Are Mandatory for Courthouse/Courtroom Entry
Demurrer
MOVING PARTY: Defendants C&L Fashions and Designs, Inc.,
In Hwan Cho,
No Soon Lee, and
Un Yong Han
OPPOSITION: None
Plaintiff Doodu, Inc., (“Plaintiff”) is a women’s clothing wholesaler and
manufacturer. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants C&L Fashions and Designs, Inc., In Hwan
Cho, No Soon Lee, and Un Yong Han (collectively, “Defendants”) owed money from
ordering and receiving women’s clothes.
On August 19, 2019, Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint (“FAC”) against Defendants
alleging causes of action for:
Account Stated;
Open Book Account;
Fraud;
Account Stated;
Open Book Account;
Fraud.
On September 23, 2019, Defendants filed a demurrer and motion to strike.
Uncertainty: OVERRULED
Defendant argues that all six causes of action are vague, ambiguous,