HEARING DATE: November 19, 2020
CASE NUMBER: 19STCV19952
CASE NAME: Ultimate Action, LLC v. Michael Joel Kamen
MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff, Ultimate Action, LLC
OPPOSING PARTY: Defendant, Michael Joel Kamen
TRIAL DATE: Post Judgment – Default Judgment entered December 9, 2019
PROOF OF SERVICE: OK
MOTION: Plaintiff’s Motion for Charging Order
OPPOSITION: None as of November 16, 2020
REPLY: No opposition filed.
TENTATIVE: Plaintiff’s motion is granted. Plaintiff is to prepare an order. Plaintiff is to give notice.
Background
This is an action for alleged breach of a guaranty, filed on June 7, 2019. Plaintiff, Ultimate Action, LLC (“Plaintiff”), alleges that on or about January 25, 2008, 501 Grant Street Partners, LLC (“Grant Partners”) signed a mortgage note in favor of California National Bank(“Cal-National”) (Complaint, ¶ 7, Exhibit A.) Plaintiff further alleges that on or about May 16, 2012, U.S. Bank, N.A., as successor-in-interest to Cal-National, obtained a judgment against
Hearing Date
November 19, 2020
Type
Other Promissory Note/Collections Case (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Default Judgment By Court - Before Trial 12/09/2019
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
HEARING DATE: November 19, 2020
CASE NUMBER: 19STCV19952
CASE NAME: Ultimate Action, LLC v. Michael Joel Kamen
MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff, Ultimate Action, LLC
OPPOSING PARTY: Defendant, Michael Joel Kamen
TRIAL DATE: Post Judgment – Default Judgment entered December 9, 2019
PROOF OF SERVICE: OK
MOTION: Plaintiff’s Motion for Charging Order
OPPOSITION: None as of November 16, 2020
REPLY: No opposition filed.
TENTATIVE: Plaintiff’s motion is granted. Plaintiff is to prepare an order. Plaintiff is to give notice.
Background
This is an action for alleged breach of a guaranty, filed on June 7, 2019. Plaintiff, Ultimate Action, LLC (“Plaintiff”), alleges that on or about January 25, 2008, 501 Grant Street Partners, LLC (“Grant Partners”) signed a mortgage note in favor of California National Bank(“Cal-National”) (Complaint, ¶ 7, Exhibit A.) Plaintiff further alleges that on or about May 16, 2012, U.S. Bank, N.A., as successor-in-interest to Cal-National, obtained a judgment against